
Chandra, Chill of Compliance
CommentsStandard 70 Eng.B+Usr.—
Conditional spell draw plus restricted ramp fits Izzet Control; it is a stronger long-game engine than Ral Zarek, Guest Lecturer (60), though it needs time.
Could be wrong if The first +1 misses on lands and creatures, and three loyalty may be too vulnerable against the format's aggressive decks.
Pioneer 58 Eng.C+Usr.—
Izzet Control can exploit its spell density and mana +1. It offers more sustained material than Ral Zarek, Guest Lecturer (45), but lacks Narset's disruption.
Could be wrong if Pioneer may punish a three-mana engine that does not reliably affect the board or generate a card immediately.
Modern 36 Eng.DUsr.—
It may merit testing in Izzet spell shells, but three mana and no assured immediate return are major liabilities beside Narset, Parter of Veils (64).
Could be wrong if An unusually efficient noncreature combo shell could turn the mana ability and emblem into more than a slow value plan.
Legacy 39 Eng.DUsr.—
It can be a slow card engine in blue control, but three mana is a major ask against Legacy interaction and threats; Tezzeret, Cruel Captain (28) is a low baseline.
Could be wrong if Dense cantrip shells could make its conditional draw substantially more reliable than a conventional control list.
Commander 52 Eng.CUsr.—
Spellslinger decks value repeatable selection, restricted mana, and a credible spell-draw emblem, but this is an attackable multiplayer engine.
Could be wrong if Planeswalkers that need several turns can be removed by opponents before the emblem or repeated card advantage matters.
Limited 82 Eng.AUsr.—
A three-mana walker that filters into spells, ramps them, or stuns a key attacker is strong first-pick material, though it does not fully protect itself.
Could be wrong if Unknown set speed, creature pressure, and removal density determine whether its three starting loyalty is sustainable.
“A three-mana blue planeswalker that conditionally draws spells, funds noncreature turns, and can temporarily lock down a threat.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0