Chandra, Torch of Defiance

A credible grindy red threat: it kills a creature, supplies card access, or funds a follow-up spell. It sits above Ral, Crackling Wit (42) but below Kaito (58).

Could be wrong if Current red decks may be too low-curved, leaving no tiered shell willing to pay four mana for a vulnerable walker.

Four mana and double red are substantial costs; Chandra's removal and value are real but slower than Modern's usual demands. It trails Kaito, Bane of Nightmares (43).

Could be wrong if A successful red prison or midrange shell could make her recurring mana and card access materially better than expected.

Ancient Tomb can support a four-mana walker, and Chandra provides removal, cards, and immediate {R}{R}. She remains less efficient than Legacy's stronger walkers such as Kaito (58).

Could be wrong if If fast mana prison lists become prominent, her ability to cast another spell immediately could support more copies.

Repeatable impulse access, creature removal, and mana are useful in red planeswalker shells, but a four-mana walker attacked by multiple opponents is a modest standalone engine.

Could be wrong if Red spell-casting or Superfriends builds may value the emblem and mana mode enough to make her a broader inclusion.

A four-loyalty planeswalker that immediately kills many creatures, generates cards, and threatens a game-ending emblem is a major Limited bomb.

Could be wrong if Unknown speed, evasive-creature density, and removal can determine whether she survives long enough to generate repeated value.