Liliana the Faultless

Potentially testable beside many creatures, but a 1/1 with no immediate board impact is weaker than Gran-Gran (35); discard-based protection is costly.

Could be wrong if A strong token or life-gain payoff from the incomplete set could make repeated ETB life gain materially useful.

Pioneer demands more impact than this fragile 1/1 provides. Its protection mode costs mana, tapping, and a card, making it weaker than credible role-players.

Could be wrong if An established creature-combo shell may value repeatable protection enough to accept the card disadvantage.

Modern's efficient removal and pace punish a 1/1 that neither advances a combo nor protects itself. It is far below flexible utility cards such as Dryad Arbor (38).

Could be wrong if Its legendary status could create an unprovided Mox Amber or creature-combo application.

Legacy requires unusually efficient or unique effects. A sorcery-speed 1/1 whose protection requires a discard is not comparable to active two-drops like Phelia (65).

Could be wrong if A niche legendary-permanent engine or protected creature combo could give it a small specialist role.

Token-heavy decks can turn it into steady incidental life gain, with occasional protection for a key creature, but repeated discard is a poor multiplayer cost.

Could be wrong if A commander or token engine that specifically rewards life-gain triggers could make it a stronger synergy inclusion.

A 1/1 is a weak body, but frequent creature entries can buy time and the activation can protect a bomb. It lacks enough impact to be premium.

Could be wrong if Draft speed, token density, and removal quality are unknown; abundant tokens could raise its value substantially.