
Bilbo's Gambit
CommentsStandard 42 Eng.D+Usr.—
Unlike Negate, this only delays a spell and often grants mana for its replay; its turn-lock offers a narrow anti-combo or tempo sideboard use.
Could be wrong if A spell-chain or combo-heavy Standard could make the one-turn casting lock substantially more valuable.
Pioneer 37 Eng.DUsr.—
Broader than Disdainful Stroke, but it provides no lasting answer and the Treasure can fund protection or replay; likely only a narrow sideboard test.
Could be wrong if If a key Pioneer combo is especially vulnerable to ending its casting turn, control decks could adopt more copies.
Modern 32 Eng.D-Usr.—
The Treasure is available before resolution, and this loses card economy versus real counters; it is far less efficient than Consign to Memory or Mystical Dispute.
Could be wrong if A prevalent spell-chain matchup where one interrupted turn is decisive could create a specialized sideboard role.
Legacy 24 Eng.FUsr.—
Two mana to delay rather than counter while granting mana is far below Spell Pierce and Legacy's free interaction; no credible shell is evident.
Could be wrong if A new combo strategy unusually vulnerable to a resolved turn-lock could make it a niche answer.
Commander 41 Eng.D+Usr.—
It can interrupt a spell-heavy turn, but returning one spell and ramping its caster is weak multiplayer interaction; a niche control inclusion.
Could be wrong if More combo-dense optimized tables would improve the value of temporarily preventing all further spells.
Limited 37 Eng.DUsr.—
A two-mana delay can preserve tempo, but the Treasure offsets it and the spell never answers a card; below-average reactive filler.
Could be wrong if Unknown set speed, combat tricks, and spell-based archetypes could make the temporary lock better or worse.
“A two-mana spell delay whose Gift mode can halt a turn, but it trades a card and a Treasure for temporary disruption.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Previewed 23 July by TCGplayer
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0