
Dwarven Mattock
CommentsStandard 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Pioneer 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Modern 22 Eng.FUsr.—
Far below Shadowspear's efficiency: +2/+2 and ward {1} do not justify a conditional attachment and equip {3} without unshown Dwarf support.
Could be wrong if A dense, competitive Dwarf shell or a relevant Equipment synergy could make the free initial attachment matter.
Legacy 16 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's cheap interaction and fast threats make a conditional two-mana combat Equipment with equip {3} a poor rate.
Could be wrong if Unrevealed Dwarf synergies or a prison shell exploiting cheap artifacts could create a narrow role.
Commander 36 Eng.DUsr.—
A Dwarf deck can value the immediate attachment and modest protection, but +2/+2 and ward {1} are replaceable and equip {3} is clumsy.
Could be wrong if The eventual Dwarf commander or Equipment payoffs may make this a more efficient recurring synergy piece.
Limited 51 Eng.CUsr.—
On a Dwarf it is a strong two-mana stat boost; off-tribe, five total mana to move +2/+2 makes it merely replacement-level.
Could be wrong if Unknown Dwarf density, archetypes, and removal determine how often the free attachment outweighs equip {3}.
“Efficient only on a Dwarf; otherwise its expensive equip cost leaves it a low-impact combat upgrade.”
Rated on limited context — few cards from this set are revealed yet.
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Previewed 29 July by Husky TCG
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0