Gollum the Abandoned
CommentsStandard 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Pioneer 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Modern 27 Eng.FUsr.—
Much weaker graveyard interaction than Soulless Jailer; its only plausible edge is a costly sacrifice-shell recursion loop.
Could be wrong if A dense sacrifice-and-ETB shell could make its repeatable drain and recovery more useful than expected.
Legacy 21 Eng.FUsr.—
Far below Dauthi Voidwalker's rate: one-card graveyard exile and a nonblocking 2/2 do not justify its fodder-intensive recursion.
Could be wrong if A new efficient sacrifice shell or unusually relevant graveyard metagame could create a narrow role.
Commander 42 Eng.D+Usr.—
Aristocrats decks value the multiplayer drain and recoverable body, but it needs an outlet, separate fodder, and five mana to replay.
Could be wrong if Reliable sacrifice engines and cheap fodder may make repeated ETBs more practical than expected.
Limited 53 Eng.CUsr.—
A two-mana 2/2 that drains 2 is serviceable aggression; inability to block hurts, while fodder-dependent recursion is late upside.
Could be wrong if Unknown set speed and sacrifice density determine whether recursion is meaningful or merely text.
“A low-rate aggressive creature whose repeatable drain is gated by death, fodder, and a costly return-to-hand loop.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0