Pinecone Strike

Pinecone Strike

Comments
{1}{R} · Instant
Common · The Hobbit · Art by Javier Charro
Choose one or both — • Pinecone Strike deals 3 damage to target creature. If that creature would die this turn, exile it instead. • Destroy target artifact token.
Predicted power
Standard 47 Eng.C-Usr.

Three damage plus exile is useful against small creatures and death value, but it is slower and less flexible than Burst Lightning; token-only artifact hate limits adoption.

Best home Izzet Control sideboardBand role-playerConfidence 58%

Could be wrong if Artifact-token decks or graveyard-recursion creatures may become common enough to make the two-for-one mode a regular maindeck draw.

Pioneer 37 Eng.DUsr.

It is substantially narrower than Abrade, matching its creature-damage rate but hitting only artifact tokens. Exile gives it a plausible, narrow sideboard role.

Best home Mono-Red Deck Wins sideboardBand fringeConfidence 65%

Could be wrong if A metagame centered on artifact creature tokens or creatures that must be exiled could raise its sideboard demand.

Modern 26 Eng.FUsr.

Two mana for three creature-only damage is below Modern's normal removal rate, and destroying only artifact tokens is too narrow to displace efficient red interaction.

Best home Boros Aggro sideboardBand speculativeConfidence 73%

Could be wrong if A prominent artifact-token engine or a low-toughness graveyard creature deck could create a specialized sideboard use.

Legacy 21 Eng.FUsr.

Legacy's one-mana interaction makes this inefficient, while the artifact mode misses actual artifacts. The exile rider is insufficient compensation for the mana cost.

Best home Boros Aggro sideboardBand speculativeConfidence 78%

Could be wrong if A successful token-based artifact strategy vulnerable to three damage and exile could create a small sideboard niche.

Pauper 38 Eng.DUsr.

It is outclassed by Lightning Bolt and Galvanic Blast as general red removal, but instant exile and occasional artifact-token utility support fringe use.

Best home Mono-Red Deck Wins sideboardBand fringeConfidence 66%

Could be wrong if Token density and the number of relevant three-toughness creatures will determine whether its added mode merits a removal slot.

Commander 25 Eng.FUsr.

This is far narrower than Prismari Command: three damage rarely matters in multiplayer, and artifact-token-only removal is too replaceable for most optimized lists.

Band speculativeConfidence 76%

Could be wrong if A red deck specifically needing exile-based death denial while facing many artifact tokens could value the compact two-mode effect.

Limited 61 Eng.B-Usr.

Cheap instant three-damage removal will normally make decks, and exile plus artifact-token destruction occasionally creates a meaningful two-for-one; 3 damage is not universal.

Best home Red-based draft decksBand solidConfidence 48%

Could be wrong if Unknown creature toughness, removal density, and artifact-token prevalence could move it from solid removal to ordinary filler.

Creature removal with token hate

“A serviceable two-mana creature kill spell whose artifact-token clause adds situational sideboard and Limited value.”

AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.

Previewed 30 July by RobertRedBeardMTG

Comments 0

Loading comments…