
Quarrel
CommentsStandard 42 Eng.D+Usr.—
Selesnya Aggro can turn a developed creature into instant-speed removal, but needing both a creature and enough power makes it unreliable.
Could be wrong if Durable, high-power Standard creatures or a creature-heavy metagame could make it a regular inclusion.
Pioneer 36 Eng.DUsr.—
The Rock could test it against larger creatures, but Fatal Push and other independent removal make this 1G board-dependent spell narrow.
Could be wrong if A creature-heavy metagame where its power-based damage reaches targets Push cannot could raise sideboard adoption.
Modern 27 Eng.FUsr.—
At 1G and requiring a creature already in play, it is much less reliable than Modern's cheap independent interaction; no clear listed shell needs it.
Could be wrong if A green creature shell with unusually large, resilient bodies could make it a narrow sideboard tool.
Legacy 22 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's exceptional mana efficiency and cheap interaction leave little room for conditional two-mana creature removal that needs a board.
Could be wrong if A future green creature strategy that reliably presents oversized threats could create a niche use.
Pauper 47 Eng.C-Usr.—
Elves can supply creatures and may value one-sided instant removal, but small bodies and stronger independent removal constrain it to a niche role.
Could be wrong if If common green decks consistently field large bodies, its instant speed could make it a more frequent inclusion.
Commander 43 Eng.D+Usr.—
Large or deathtouch creatures turn this into cheap removal, but it is blank without a creature and can answer only creatures.
Could be wrong if More combat-focused tables or commanders that provide reliable large bodies would improve its inclusion rate.
Limited 69 Eng.BUsr.—
Two-mana instant one-sided creature removal is highly efficient and scales with normal creature curves, though it needs a suitable body.
Could be wrong if Token-heavy boards, undersized green creatures, or unusually efficient opposing removal could lower its reliability.
“Quarrel is efficient conditional removal: strong with a board, but its failure case and lack of player targets limit constructed adoption.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Previewed 30 July by RobertRedBeardMTG
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0