
Bitter Downfall
CommentsModern 28 Eng.FUsr.—
A one-mana follow-up to damage is efficient, but it needs setup; it is far less reliable than Dismember and four mana is unacceptable otherwise.
Could be wrong if A strong damage-based shell could make the discounted mode frequent enough for sideboard adoption.
Legacy 20 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy removal must be more immediate and reliable; unlike Dismember, this is either setup-dependent or a very inefficient four-mana answer.
Could be wrong if An emerging black-red tempo shell with repeatable cheap damage could create a narrow role.
Commander 36 Eng.DUsr.—
It is serviceable instant creature removal in decks that routinely ping or fight, but four mana and creature-only targeting leave it behind broader answers.
Could be wrong if Repeatable commander-based damage could make the one-mana mode substantially more dependable than expected.
Limited 64 Eng.B-Usr.—
Four-mana instant creature destruction is normally solid, and combat or burn can occasionally turn it into a huge one-mana tempo play.
Could be wrong if Unknown speed, removal density, and damage-enabler availability could shift its pickup priority materially.
“A four-mana kill spell whose one-mana mode is powerful but requires prior damage, limiting it mostly to combat- or burn-oriented decks.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0