
Errand-Rider of Gondor
CommentsModern 24 Eng.FUsr.—
A three-mana 3/2 is far below Modern's normal rate; legend-enabled card draw may prompt testing, but the floor is only selection.
Could be wrong if A dense, competitive legend-and-flicker shell could make its full-cantrip mode more reliable.
Legacy 18 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's efficiency makes a three-mana conditional cantrip creature unlikely to compete, even though the no-legend mode smooths draws.
Could be wrong if A new efficient legendary-creature shell with repeatable blink effects could create a niche.
Pauper 34 Eng.D-Usr.—
The ETB offers useful selection and is blinkable, but a three-mana 3/2 without reliable card advantage is a modest Pauper payoff.
Could be wrong if Legend density and the availability of stronger ETB draw creatures determine whether Ephemerate lists test it.
Commander 37 Eng.DUsr.—
Creature commanders often turn it into a full cantrip, but it is less efficient than Wall of Omens and needs blink or legend synergy to matter.
Could be wrong if If optimized legend decks value repeatable ETB card draw more than the mana premium, adoption could rise.
Limited 56 Eng.C+Usr.—
A normal three-mana 3/2 with immediate hand smoothing should make decks; controlling a legend upgrades it into meaningful card advantage.
Could be wrong if Unknown legend density, archetypes, and format speed could leave the conditional draw mode too infrequent.
“A modest three-mana body that is card-neutral selection without a legend and a true cantrip only in legend-enabled decks.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0