
Galadhrim Guide
CommentsModern 11 Eng.FUsr.—
A four-mana 3/4 that only scries 2 lacks material or tempo payoff and is far below Modern options such as Seasoned Pyromancer.
Could be wrong if An unrevealed competitive Elf or blink shell could value the ETB selection, though no supporting payoff is supplied.
Legacy 7 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's Brainstorm and Ponder make four-mana scry 2 untenable; a vanilla-sized 3/4 does not repay the enormous mana cost.
Could be wrong if A new cheap way to repeatedly exploit its ETB trigger could create a fringe niche, but none is established here.
Pauper 19 Eng.FUsr.—
Pauper four-drops such as Archaeomancer provide actual card advantage; a 3/4 with scry 2 is unlikely to merit a competitive slot.
Could be wrong if A slow environment or meaningful revealed Elf/blink payoff could make its body and repeatable selection more serviceable.
Commander 21 Eng.FUsr.—
Elf typing gives it a possible tribal slot, but four mana for a 3/4 and minor selection is highly replaceable in optimized Commander.
Could be wrong if A commander that specifically rewards repeated scrying or Elf bodies could create a stronger niche than the standalone rate suggests.
Limited 61 Eng.B-Usr.—
A 3/4 for four affects the board acceptably, while scry 2 improves later draws; it is solid rather than premium without card advantage.
Could be wrong if Set speed, removal, green's curve, and archetypes are unknown; fast pressure lowers it, while slow board stalls raise it.
“A four-mana 3/4 with scry 2 is reasonable Limited material but lacks the rate or payoff for established eternal formats.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0