Miss Highwater

It is far less disruptive than Thought-Knot Seer and has no entry value; a four-mana 5/3 that can refill the opponent is not a credible Modern rate.

Could be wrong if An unusually effective Demon or combat-damage shell could provide support not present in the supplied context.

Compared with Barrowgoyf, this costs too much for a vulnerable threat and provides opponents a favorable optional refill, with no efficient Legacy role evident.

Could be wrong if Ancient Tomb-based creature decks could test the body, though the {B}{B} cost and trigger remain substantial liabilities.

Connecting can offer an opponent seven cards while threatening to copy their board when they lose; that is real political leverage, but slow and unreliable.

Could be wrong if The delayed contract payoff may prove much stronger if opponents accept refills often and their boards are routinely substantial.

A four-mana 5/3 menace is a major combat threat, though opponents with weak hands can turn a hit into a seven-card refill; the contract payoff rarely matters.

Could be wrong if Unknown removal density and speed, plus how often opponents can profitably take the refill, could move it materially.