
Gin'tak Charge
CommentsModern 28 Eng.FUsr.—
A one-mana spell has some prowess utility, but sorcery-speed 2 damage is far below Modern interaction and burn efficiency; likely only fringe testing.
Could be wrong if Could gain a role if spell-count payoffs value any cheap targeted damage more than the supplied context shows.
Legacy 21 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's rate and instant-speed demands make 2 sorcery damage poor removal and weak reach; Boros Aggro is the only plausible trial home.
Could be wrong if A presently unseen density of one-toughness targets or dedicated spell payoffs could create a narrow role.
Pauper 37 Eng.DUsr.—
Mono-Red can use cheap reach, but this is substantially weaker than Lightning Bolt (91) and likely only supplements premium burn in select lists.
Could be wrong if Pauper burn's need for redundant face damage could support more copies than its weak removal rate suggests.
Commander 8 Eng.FUsr.—
Two sorcery-speed damage is negligible against 40-life multiplayer tables and does not provide meaningful card advantage or scaling.
Could be wrong if A commander that specifically rewards casting or copying cheap damage spells could make it a niche inclusion.
Limited 59 Eng.C+Usr.—
One mana to kill many early creatures or finish damaged opponents is efficient, though sorcery speed and the revealed 3.84 average mana value limit it.
Could be wrong if Unknown creature toughnesses, speed, and removal density could move it between ordinary playable and premium removal.
“A sorcery-speed two-damage effect is chiefly Limited removal; eternal adoption depends on unusually high spell-density demand.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0