
Last Gasp
CommentsModern 23 Eng.FUsr.—
Fatal Push (88) and Dismember (72) are far more efficient or scalable; -3/-3 is only a narrow answer to small or indestructible creatures.
Could be wrong if A metagame concentrated on three-toughness or indestructible threats could create a sideboard niche.
Legacy 19 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's one-mana removal, especially Fatal Push (75), leaves little room for a two-mana spell capped at -3/-3.
Could be wrong if Toughness reduction's ability to answer indestructible threats may matter more than expected.
Pauper 41 Eng.D+Usr.—
Compared with Cast Down (84), it misses too many larger creatures, but instant -3/-3 can be a niche answer to small or indestructible threats.
Could be wrong if If most key creatures have three or less toughness, it could become a more regular black removal option.
Commander 22 Eng.FUsr.—
Two mana to give only -3/-3 is too narrow for multiplayer creature sizes and is readily replaced by unconditional removal.
Could be wrong if A dedicated -1/-1-counter or indestructible-heavy local metagame could make the effect more useful.
Limited 68 Eng.BUsr.—
Cheap instant-speed removal that usually kills small creatures and wins combat is a premium common, though larger creatures can survive -3/-3.
Could be wrong if Unknown creature toughness, speed, and black removal depth could move it between solid and premium.
“A serviceable common removal spell for Limited, but substantially outclassed by broader removal in most eternal formats.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0