
Plasma Cascade
CommentsStandard 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Pioneer 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Modern 24 Eng.FUsr.—
Three mana for 3 damage plus filtering is far below Modern rate; Faithful Mending (50) is a much cheaper graveyard-selection option.
Could be wrong if A new discard-payoff shell could make the optional rummage worth the inefficient burn spell.
Legacy 21 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's efficient burn, removal, and cantrips leave little room for a three-mana 3-damage rummage spell.
Could be wrong if A niche graveyard deck could want an instant-speed discard outlet that also targets creatures or players.
Pauper 59 Eng.C+Usr.—
Madness Burn can use the discard outlet and reach; it compares favorably when hard-cast to Fiery Temper (58), but costs too much for broad adoption.
Could be wrong if The three-mana baseline may be too slow, and unrevealed Madness density determines whether its discard clause matters.
Commander 34 Eng.D-Usr.—
A flexible small removal spell that rummages has a niche in discard-focused decks, but 3 damage and no card advantage are weak at multiplayer scale.
Could be wrong if More available payoff cards or commanders for discarding could make the effect a more desirable synergy slot.
Limited 68 Eng.BUsr.—
Instant-speed 3 damage to any target is strong common removal and late reach; optional rummaging adds meaningful flood protection without costing a card.
Could be wrong if Creature toughness, removal density, and draft speed are unknown; abundant large creatures could reduce its removal value.
“Three-mana instant Lightning Strike with optional rummaging; strong Limited removal, a possible Pauper Madness role-player, and unlikely eternal adoption.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0